M91 Moisin Nagant in US Service

M1903, M1903A3 and M1917.
Post Reply
User avatar
Smokey
Member
Member
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:46 pm
Age: 67
Location: West Virginia

M91 Moisin Nagant in US Service

Post by Smokey »

Not so well known, the US Army used M91s built for Russia (and not delivered) a fair amount in WWI:
https://www.gunsamerica.com/digest/a-mo ... e-us-army/
So those were even an issued rifle for US troops.
Arguing with someone who denounces reason is like administering medicine to a corpse.

72 usmc
Gun Junkie
Gun Junkie
Posts: 2506
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:28 pm
Age: 68
Location: Menomonee Falls, Wi

Re: M91 Moisin Nagant in US Service

Post by 72 usmc »

More info and some nice pictures can be found in the book Allied Rifle Contracts in America by Luke Mercado, 2011, Wet Dog publications. $50 See pages 11-54.
Chapter one, The Three Line Rifle, Model 1891 Mosin-Nagant.
51YMvaAFK3L._SX365_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
51YMvaAFK3L._SX365_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (83.3 KiB) Viewed 3429 times
Wet dog has some nice books:
https://www.wetdogstore.com/Allied-Rifl ... 97-7-2.htm
To old to fight and to old to run, a Jar head will just shoot and be done with you.

SWIHARTMARK
Member
Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 5:09 pm
Age: 54
Location: DAYTON, OHIO

Re: M91 Moisin Nagant in US Service

Post by SWIHARTMARK »

A M1917 Enfield in 30-06 has peep sights, which the M91 Mosin doesn't, so it should shoot better. Peep sights usually win over standard tangent ones I believe. Too bad the US troops didn't have M39 Finnish Mosins with SAKO barrels. There is something to be said for a good barrel and trigger.

Best Regards,

Mark

slowbob2
Member
Member
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 4:02 pm
Age: 38
Location: slaton

Re: M91 Moisin Nagant in US Service

Post by slowbob2 »

That would depend on the peep sights aperture size , and the target . Also it would depend a lot on the shooters eyes . The very small hole on the M-1903 makes a good target sight , but become very hard to use in low light or moving targets . The larger hole on the M-1917 is a draw back on small targets , but makes general area hits easier . The very large hole on the No 4 Enfield and Type 99 make it very hard to shoot small groups on small targets , but they both do fine on man size targets . I personally do my best with the Mauser V rear and inverted V front sight .

TNGhost
Member
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2017 5:22 pm
Age: 58
Location: New England

Re: M91 Moisin Nagant in US Service

Post by TNGhost »

Probably even lesser known is that our troops used the M91 on Russian soil and against Bolshevik Russians in offensive operations north of Moscow, and defensive and strategic area and facilities control operations in Siberia. Approximately 13,000 American troops were in Russia for several months, 100 years ago this winter:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_ ... e,_Siberia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_ ... rth_Russia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H3Y_qvwGdY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AG6SHTVqFyE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDxG5G5e7-w

https://www.archives.gov/publications/p ... sia-1.html

Post Reply

Return to “United States Rifles”